Sunday, August 23, 2009

Hatch intentionally wrong, unintentionally right

Here's Hatch intentionally wrong:

SEN. HATCH: ...both independent analysts and government analysts, the CBO, have indicated that tens of millions of people who go with the government plan...

MR. GREGORY: Well, wait a minute, Senator Hatch, that's not right.

SEN. HATCH: ...will destroy the private health industry.

MR. GREGORY: The Congressional Budget Office did not say that. In fact, what they have concluded...

SEN. HATCH: Yes, it did say that.

MR. GREGORY: ...is that, well...

SEN. HATCH: Yes, it did.

MR. GREGORY: The CBO said that, in fact, those enrolled in private insurance plans would go up by three million, and they estimate that about 10 million people, only 10 million people go into a public plan.

Meet the Press Transcript
August 23, 2009

The CBO report estimated only about 10 million to 11 million people would sign up for the public option by 2019, far fewer than the 83 million cited in another analysis by the Lewin Group. The Lewin Group is part of Ingenix, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group.

Reuters
Democrats cite CBO report to bolster healthcare case
July 27, 2009

(Hatch also called Canada, Germany, France, and England single-payer when Germany and France are not.)

Here's Hatch unintentionally right:
You know, if you go down through it, anybody that believes that the federal government is going to take this over and do a better job than the private sector, even with all the faults of the private sector, I, I think just hasn't looked at the last, at the last 30 years.
I have to agree with him here: Since Ronald Reagan became president about 30 years ago the federal government has had a shoddy record.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Time to put anger back in its rightful place

You know what's the only thing more than ridiculous than Medicare recipients attending town halls to speak out against health care reform? Working class, poor, and unemployed people who lack health care insurance and do the same. Yet Kathleen Parker finds it important to tell us "Even if protests are staged, the town-hall anger is real":
The town-hall protests may be orchestrated, but nobody had to manufacture the anger on display. With unemployment at 9.4 percent, the dog days are beginning to feel like the dogs of war. Congress and Obama might want to take note.
So according to this professional writer and pundit, it's genuine for the unemployed and those fearful of unemployment to protest the possibility of getting or keeping health care. Hello--When you're unemployed you will no longer have employer-based healthcare and won't be able to afford to maintain your healthcare payments for long on your own. Turn on the left side of your brain before you write next time, will you Ms. Parker? And I'm just getting started on the dumbf---ery of those she defends in her article.

If the United States were a sophisticated nation, we would have had national health care already by now. It seemed to me that with a Democratic President, a Democratic majority in the House, and 59 votes in the Senate (not 60, Lieberman is a anti-Democrat in sheep's clothing), health care would be a slam dunk. But as H.L. Mencken said, and Rush Limbaugh ($400 million contract), Sean Hannity (approx $40 million a year combined), and Glenn Beck (if it's more than minimum wage it's way too much) put into practice, "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." The health insurance propagandists also know "there's a sucker born every minute," and the anti-healthcare fanatics who take their marching orders from millionaires telling them what billionaires want them to think make Linda Lovelace look like she suffered from dysphagia. Anti-healthcare fanatics need to turn off the AM radio and Fox noise and give their brains some fresh air. Who knows, maybe a Limbaughtomy is reversible.

Those of us who should be especially angry are the temporary workers. We do full-time work at reduced pay and get no benefits. We neither receive, nor can afford to buy, health insurance. The anti-healthcare fanatics disrupting healthcare at townhall meetings are trying to kill us. If they don't have health care they are also bent on killing themselves. The difference between them and psycho-killers such as Seung-Hui Cho and George Sodini is that the anti-healthcare fanatics are not using guns. At least not yet.

Saturday, May 2, 2009

President Obama has a choice with two options: prosecute or pardon the Bush administration

The Bush administration tortured.

Torture is a crime.

President Obama took an oath to "faithfully execute the office of President of the United States," and to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Criminals must be prosecuted or pardoned in order to uphold the rule of law.

President Obama must prosecute the Bush administration or pardon them. Failure to address the violations of U.S. law would be a violation of his Presidential oath of office.

Sunday, April 12, 2009

INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE GOSPELS' RESURRECTION ACCOUNTS

MATTHEWMARKLUKEJOHN
NUMBER OF VISITORS TO JESUS' TOMB2 (28.1)3 (16.1)5 or more (24.10)1 (20.1)
TIME OF VISITDoes not sayAt sunrise (16.2)At dawn (24.1)Before dawn (20.1)
MESSENGERS AT TOMBOne angel outside the tomb (28.5-6)One young man inside the tomb (16.5)Two men inside the tomb (24.4)Two angels inside the tomb (20.12)
REPORT TO DISCIPLES?Yes (28.8)No (16.8)Yes (24.9)Yes (20.2)

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Bud Hedinger led astroturf protest against President Obama

....more than 4,000 people attended the Orlando Tea Party, a conservative rally aimed at expressing discontent with Washington.

"This is maybe the greatest single gathering of God-fearing patriots in the history of Orlando, Florida," local conservative radio host Bud Hedinger, who emceed the event, told the crowd.

The attendees, many of whom said they'd heard about the rally on Hedinger's radio show, brandished flags and homemade signs bearing slogans such as "Repeal the pork or our bacon is cooked" and "Obama lied, liberty died."

"We're really scared about what's happening in our country," said [name withheld], 71, of Largo in Pinellas County. She waved a sign that read "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money" on one side, and "You can't blame Bush anymore" on the other.

Her feelings were shared by Lisa Feroli, one of the event's organizers, who said that a similar fear motivated her to e-mail Hedinger with the idea for the Orlando Tea Party.

Helen Eckinger | Orlando Sentinel Staff Writer
Orlando 'Tea Party' rally draws more than 4,000
March 22, 2009

Bud Hedinger used to be an Orlando newsman. He worked for Channels 9 and 18 news, and used to bring a weekly Paul Harvey-like news story to Real Radio's Philips Phile. Now that Hedinger works for AM 540, Orlando's Rush Limbaugh station, he has shown his true stripes: stars and bars.

Republican radio host Bud Hedinger has been a vocal admirer of General Robert E. Lee, who forsook his duty to the United States to side with the attackers of Fort Sumter. Hedinger is also a member of the Southern Baptist Convention. The Southern Baptists are the only major Christian denomination that still retains the word "Southern" in their church name and have been dubbed by former Republican strategist Kevin Phillips as the church of the Confederacy.

The historical precedent for this TEA party is not a patriotic one. After little more than 25 years as a state, Florida left the Union from January 10, 1861 until June 25, 1868, in opposition to President Lincoln. We can only hope that President Obama will become another Lincoln or Franklin Delano Roosevelt. But the cult of Hedinger is opposing Obama nonetheless.

Because Bud Hedinger is a paid Republican propagandist, he must be identified by name. But I withheld the name of the brainwashed 71-year old from Pinellas County because she probably doesn't know any better. Obviously, any retired person who sits at home collecting her social security check while listening to AM radio hosts who decry the program that is helping her to survive is not competent to stand trial.

That deceived lady was but one of 4,000+ cult-of-Hedinger protesters, who decided to protest only after we have finally rid ourselves of King George II. The eight years of George W. Bush featured open violations of Article VI, Amendment IV, Amendment VII, and Amendment XIV of The U.S. Constitution. (Samuel Adams must be spinning in his grave!) If they had any knowledge of history they would have better dubbed themselves as another "Whiskey Rebellion," which occurred in opposition to George Washington in 1794. But then if they had any knowledge of history they would know that President Obama's stimulus package is really a relief package. States and individuals need relief because we are facing the Second Republican Great Depression. Franklin Delano Roosevelt used similar spending to get us through the first one, and FDR's regulatory policies steered us clear from another panic until the Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Bush (yes, Clinton too) deregulatory policies paved the way for this one.

Socialism is characterized by "government ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods" (Webster). President Obama has appointed Wall-Street types to his administration and lectured at The University of Chicago. Clearly, Obama is not a socialist to a fault. The most "socialist" thing Obama wants to do is raise the top marginal tax rate back to that of the Clinton-era, near-40%. That hardly makes him Eugene V. Debs or Norman Thomas, much-less Lenin or Marx.

The notion that we "can't blame Bush anymore" is utterly without merit. Thanks to his father's buddy's on the Supreme Court, George W. Bush usurped the presidency in 2000. According to the popular vote, the American people never wanted Bush to be president in the first place. He and Reagan ran up over 50% of the current $10 trillion dollars of the U.S. National Debt. Government spending must by necessity increase during times of recession, so Obama is doing the right thing now. The debt should be paid down during times of prosperity the way President Clinton did and President's Bush-Reagan failed to do. These protesters are too late and misdirected at best.

Not only did Republicans seize the Presidency for eight years contrary to the will of the people, they practiced a scorched-earth policy on the U.S. government to leave their successor in a real pickle. So, can we really blame Bush for our current economic woes? I answer with a resounding:

YES WE CAN!

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Crossfire: the mother of harlots and abominations of the media

MOYERS: Which is funnier? CROSSFIRE or HARDBALL?

STEWART: CROSSFIRE or HARDBALL? Which is funnier? Which is more soul-crushing, do you mean? Both are equally dispiriting in their… you know, the whole idea that political discourse has degenerated into shows that have to be entitled CROSSFIRE and HARDBALL. And you know, "I'm Gonna Beat Your Ass" or whatever they're calling them these days is mind-boggling.

CROSSFIRE, especially, is completely an apropos name. It's what innocent bystanders are caught in when gangs are fighting. And it just boggles my mind that that's given a half hour, an hour a day to… I don't understand how issues can be dissected from the left and from the right as though… even cartoon characters have more than left and right. They have up and down.

I mean, how... it's so two-dimensional to think that any analysis can come from, "It's the left and it's the right and well, we've had that discussion and that's done."

PBS NOW w/Bill Moyers
Transcript: Bill Moyers Interviews Jon Stewart
July 11, 2003



Everything about the format of Crossfire and the political chat shows established thereafter was tailored to right-wing demagoguery. The demagogues were elevated, given a platform equal to that of their opponents, who were often nonpartisan journalists sullied by the association. Every issue, observation, point, and fact suddenly had "another side": the right-wing side. That side was held up not by solid reportage, scholarship, and analysis but by bald ideological assertion, pseudoresearch, and raw partisanship. Under the Crossfire formula, if 99 percent of scientists agreed the earth was round, while 1 percent said it was flat, the two views were given equal time and, thus, equal validity in the minds of viewers.

David Brock
The Republican Noise Machine
Crown Publishing Group 2004



Now in their voting [the Spartans] usually decide by shout and not by ballot....

THUCYDIDES
English translation by Charles Forster Smith
G.P. Putnam's Sons 1921

When it comes to the bastardization of TV news, Crossfire and The McLaughlin Group were THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE media. Both shows were founded by Republicans. TV host John McLaughlin was a speechwriter and adviser to President Nixon. Ted Turner was a member of the Young Republicans in 1963 and spoke to Reagan-era National Conservative Foundation in 1984. Both shows featured the bellicose Republican partisan Pat Buchanan. Both shows were precursors to the scream-fests on Fox "News."

After Ted Turner failed to take over CBS, supposedly desiring to change it to a "pro-family, pro-America type" network, he bought himself a 24-hour news network. With so many programming time slots to fill, Turner hired a lot of movement conservatives for CNN. Thus many shows began to feature "From the right, Buchanan or Novak" and "From the left, the facts." The facts were brought to the viewer by a typically milquetoast journalist and labeled "liberal." Hence, facts came to be thought of as having a liberal bias, and all political discussion were skewed right.

Thus, CNN moved the center of poltical discussion to the right while lending credence to the Republicans' bullsh*t "liberal media" mantra at the same time. After Fox outfoxed them at this game, they have refocused their efforts on being a legitimate news network. But they still gave rise to likes of Glenn Beck and Lou Dobbs.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Glenn Beck: A giant leap forward in the evolution of blind partisanship

After eight years of turning a blind-eye to the nightmare that was the Bush administration, Glenn Beck has teamed up with Fox "News" to frighten people about nightmare scenarios under President Obama's administration. The real kicker is, Beck is making all the Obama-nightmares up!





Because he is the polar opposite of a journalist, Glenn Beck fabricated his "War Room" segment whole-cloth after ignoring the real nightmare that took place during the previous administration.

The Bush administration had too many crimes and scandals to list in toto. Here are but a few new stories that Glenn Beck turned a blind-eye toward:
The Bush administration had a secret, Cheney-led energy task force that led to power shortages in California and $100+ per barrel/$4+ per gallon oil and gas; failed to act upon the warnings of Al Qaeda's 9/11 attack; lied our country into an unjust and illegal war; authorized torture; gave no-bid contracts to crony company's to work in Iraq; "Lost" billions in unaccounted for hundred dollar bills there; failed to equip U.S. soldiers with adequate body armor; re-opened Abu Ghraib to torture Iraqis again--thus violating the Geneva Convention and Article six of the Constitution; responded too-little, too-late to Hurricane Katrina's destruction of a major U.S. city; Let the 9/11-mastermind Osama bin Laden remain at-large while conflating him with Saddam Hussein; Palled around with the likes of Kenneth Lay and Jack Abramoff, not mention the king of the Saudi Arabia--the nation from which 15 of 19 9/11 hijackers originated; granted White House access to fake reporters such as Jeff Gannon and paid others such as Arm$trong William$ to run favorable stories; had henchmen jam Democratic phone lines while disenfranchising mostly democratic voters; had it's vice president shoot another man in the face then coaxed an apology out of the victim; overlooked squalid conditions for veterans at Walter Reed hospital; wiretapped American citizen without warrants in violation of the fourth amendment; falsely reported the circumstances of Pat Tillman's death to his family and to the press; covered-up reports of the toxicity of the air quality at ground zero of the World Trade Center; outed the identity of a covert CIA agent in political retaliation for being called out on the sixteen-word lie about the war in Iraq; fired state prosecutors for not pressing charges completely along partisan lines; and book-ended his administration with recessions despite running running the national debt above $10 trillion after inheriting a balanced budget. See also Jeffrey Billman's Bush timeline, Bushed, and Still Bushed.
While maintaining such an ostrich-like, head-in-the-sand posture toward all these Bush scandals, Beck practically issued a fatwa against Michael Moore, who documented some of Bush's wrongdoings on film in the movie Fahrenheit 9/11.

As with all the journalistic sellouts employed by Fox "News," Shepherd Smith is about as partisan a Republican as you'll find anywhere. But even he finds Glenn Beck worthy of mockery.



The Glenn Beck phenomenon presents final proof that CNN is not a liberal network. Giving Glenn Beck his first full TV show (prior to Fox) is just one of many facts that lay waste to that Republican lie about CNN. But more on that tomorrow.

If I had to choose, I'd much prefer having an idiot TV-guy to mock instead of the idiot president we had before. My biggest concern is that Glenn Beck's extreme extremism might make others on Fox "News" seem reasonable by contrast. Remember, just because others on Fox "News" may not be as bat-sh*t crazy as Glenn Beck doesn't mean they aren't necessarily still wrong all the time.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Stewart to Cramer: CNBC needs to shape up

"See, the thing is, we need your help. Right now you're helping the politicians and the corporations. And we're left out there to mow our lawns."
--Jon Stewart on Crossfire, October 15, 2004

"Maybe we could remove the 'financial expert' and 'In Cramer We Trust' and start going back to the fundamentals of reporting.'"
--Jon Stewart to Jim Cramer, March 12, 2009

Three months after Jon Stewart appeared on, Crossfire, that show was canceled. It will be interesting to see how Mad Money fairs, and if it can get better.

CNN re-evaluated their mission statement as the "Cable News Network"; It's time for the "Consumer News and Business Channel" (CNBC) to do the same.
Yesterday Jim Cramer faced up to Jon Stewart on The Daily Show. Prior to the interview I thought perhaps Cramer would hold the upper hand. I still had the paradigm in my mind that when a guy from a business channel enters into a debate with a guy from a comedy network, the business man would hold all the fact cards and, thus, the advantage. But boy was that paradigm proved wrong! (If you did not watch The Daily Show last night, it would be worthwhile to watch all three parts of the interview below.)







Perhaps the most notable quote by Stewart was,
I think, clearly, it would be a great service to the American public if there was an organization out there--not just the SEC--but a news organization that was trying to maintain the intent [of the law, not just the letter] and force companies to still have growth and profit but not in a way that burns down the field.
Some would counter Stewart with the platitude that anyone who would invest money based upon what someone says on TV is a fool. Such an opinion, however, assumes that we always have print news. The truth is that newspapers constantly keep going out of business, downsizing, and consolidating; so we need, more than ever, for TV news to step up. After Rupert Murdoch bought the Wall Street Journal, I think people looked to CNBC for an alternative viewpoint. Murdoch's mission as displayed on Fox "News" is to be a 24/7/365 infomercial for the Republican Party. While Wall Street's interests often coincide with those of Republicans, we'd like to think they put sound business ahead of politics. Furthermore, CNBC has responsibility to the consumer and not just the fat cats. While I'm calling out CNBC, I might as well call out MSNBC. Recently, MSNBC myopically correlated President Obama for the fall in the stock market since he was elected president. As that link reports, and as anyone paying attention knows, "the Dow was on a downward trajectory months before the election, dropping 3,738 points from May 2, 2008, to November 3, 2008." Now if you want a more interesting correlation: the stock market began that decline within months after Murdoch's News Corp completed its takeover of the Wall Street Journal. With that deal the American public lost a watcher of the watchers.

Stewart did not let Cramer skate by with his doe-eyed excuse that CEOs lied to him. This point reminded me of an outstanding book that I recently finished reading:
None of the actions just mentioned could survive serious external review, a system of checks and balances. But in the corporate republic, external review is suppressed. We have instead a governmental public relations apparatus whose purpose is not to persuade but to deflect, deter, and frustrate inquiry into the operations of the government. These are the distinct characteristics of a corporate propaganda machine, easily identified by the inability, or studied unwillingness, to tell a truthful story that is consistent from one day to the next. The operations of the White House press room are a daily case in point, as the most hapless flacks on the planet struggle to accommodate today's talking points to yesterday's lies and deceptions. The working press, employed by corporate entities to whom this sort of information flow is routine, struggles to cope; outside observers (now available to the world, thanks to blogs [and I would add The Daily Show]) observe the scene with incredulity and amazement. But there is no surprise to it: the press releases of a large corporation are meant for the business pages, and there they are generally treated with deference and respect. The bloggers [and The Daily Show, for that matter] are simply applying an out-of-date standard, that of an actually independent press, to the world they observe. [emphasis added]

The Predator State
James K. Galbraith
Simon & Schuster, 2008

Business news needs to stop dutifully reporting corporate press releases at face value, and start digging deeper for the truth. While we're at it, how about we start getting more labor news as well? Wealth is accrued by land, LABOR, and capital. Land and capital--think real estate and stock bubbles--should not be the only ones reported on in the news.